Re: [PATCH] Use bounded GIN pending-list cleanup in parallel autovacuum

From: Jingtang Zhang <mrdrivingduck(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, 邱宇航 <iamqyh(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use bounded GIN pending-list cleanup in parallel autovacuum
Date: 2026-09-24 08:20:30
Message-ID: CAPsk3_Bc20UPyZUHabaX_XbFHj5riFqj6GRUBiQtJdc-=3edmw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi, Masahiko Sawada and Yuhang.

Thanks for the review! Attached is v3 with the comment updated as
suggested, rebased on current master.

> Having a reliable test at a convenient cost seems challenging to me,
> and doesn't justify its benefit. I think we can push it without a
> test.

I've left out the regression test, as discussed.

---
Best regards,
Jingtang

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-Fix-GIN-pending-list-cleanup-in-parallel-autovacuum.patch application/octet-stream 7.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2026-09-24 08:23:55 potentially missed pgindent in REL_19_STABLE
Previous Message Ashutosh Sharma 2026-09-24 08:12:23 Re: Orphaned Files in PostgreSQL