Re: [PATCH] Use bounded GIN pending-list cleanup in parallel autovacuum

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jingtang Zhang <mrdrivingduck(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: 邱宇航 <iamqyh(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use bounded GIN pending-list cleanup in parallel autovacuum
Date: 2026-09-24 18:07:44
Message-ID: CAD21AoC1=wEjipdrV=fB06dGD2by0pQMXWrMqbjnvfA4dJd89Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 1:20 AM Jingtang Zhang <mrdrivingduck(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Masahiko Sawada and Yuhang.
>
> Thanks for the review! Attached is v3 with the comment updated as
> suggested, rebased on current master.
>
> > Having a reliable test at a convenient cost seems challenging to me,
> > and doesn't justify its benefit. I think we can push it without a
> > test.
>
> I've left out the regression test, as discussed.

Thank you for updating the patch! I've pushed it.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2026-09-24 18:08:43 Re: Adding a range check on the sequence index from the publisher.
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2026-09-24 17:53:38 Re: [PATCH] Explain what the default output_plugin_libraries do