From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Rofail <markm(dot)rofail(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |
Date: | 2017-07-27 17:30:53 |
Message-ID: | CAPpHfdvxzbRBL2zytnkd1RWuY8-eig2mE4=KmCbOHGaOh2hV9g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Mark Rofail <markm(dot)rofail(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com
> > wrote:
>>
>> How many rows of FK table were referencing the PK table row you're
>> updating/deleting.
>> I wonder how may RI trigger work so fast if it has to do some job besides
>> index search with no results?
>>
> The problem here is that the only to option for the foreign key arrays are
> NO ACTION and RESTRICT which don't allow me to update/delete a refrenced
> row in the PK Table. the EXPLAIN ANALYZE only tells me that this violates
> the FK constraint.
>
> So we have two options. Either implement CASCADE or if there's a
> configration for EXPLAIN to show costs even if it violates the FK
> constraints.
>
Oh, ok. I missed that.
Could you remind me why don't we have DELETE CASCADE? I understand that
UPDATE CASCADE is problematic because it's unclear which way should we
delete elements from array. But what about DELETE CASCADE?
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-07-27 17:40:00 | Re: psql's \d and \dt are sending their complaints to different output files |
Previous Message | Claudio Freire | 2017-07-27 17:25:26 | Re: Increase Vacuum ring buffer. |