Re: jsonpath versus NaN

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: jsonpath versus NaN
Date: 2020-07-11 00:26:23
Message-ID: CAPpHfdvfK4kK1DuiAm20+U31VUVH=8REg6CVnOAgSZvoNs=RsQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 4:04 AM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I understand both patches as fixes and propose to backpatch them to 12
> if no objections.

Both patches are pushed.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhenghua Lyu 2020-07-11 00:32:32 Re: distribute_restrictinfo_to_rels if restrictinfo contains volatile functions
Previous Message David Rowley 2020-07-11 00:16:33 Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk