Re: jsonpath versus NaN

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: jsonpath versus NaN
Date: 2020-07-11 17:46:37
Message-ID: 2396094.1594489597@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 4:04 AM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I understand both patches as fixes and propose to backpatch them to 12
>> if no objections.

> Both patches are pushed.

Thanks for taking care of that!

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-07-11 18:23:34 Re: [PATCH] Remove Extra palloc Of raw_buf For Binary Format In COPY FROM
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-07-11 17:14:55 Re: Policy on cross-posting to multiple lists