From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Mason Sharp <masonlists(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: POC: Lock updated tuples in tuple_update() and tuple_delete() |
Date: | 2023-01-09 10:29:18 |
Message-ID: | CAPpHfdvbgDBF98FNiOn=OLztRU37s-bEfaTpRcAsQyi8UkGwcA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 1:10 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 12:56 PM Aleksander Alekseev
> <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> wrote:
> > > I'm going to push this if no objections.
> >
> > I took a fresh look at the patch and it LGTM. I only did a few
> > cosmetic changes, PFA v7.
> >
> > Changes since v6 are:
>
> Thank you for looking into this. It appears that I've applied changes
> proposed by Mason to v5, not v6. That lead to comment mismatch with
> the code that you've noticed. v8 should be correct. Please, recheck.
v9 also incorporates lost changes to the commit message by Pavel Borisov.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Allow-locking-updated-tuples-in-tuple_update-and--v9.patch | application/octet-stream | 35.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2023-01-09 10:38:06 | RE: Logical replication timeout problem |
Previous Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2023-01-09 10:15:20 | RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |