| From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <jim(dot)nasby(at)openscg(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: PinBuffer() no longer makes use of strategy |
| Date: | 2017-03-20 11:24:45 |
| Message-ID: | CAPpHfdui_iHatMhfGApCTB2EWEkLSKRWZrb3EE7RtB2ZT5bv4g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 3:51 AM, Jim Nasby <jim(dot)nasby(at)openscg(dot)com> wrote:
> On 3/16/17 12:48 PM, David Steele wrote:
>
>> This patch looks pretty straight forward and applies cleanly and
>> compiles at cccbdde.
>>
>> It's not a straight revert, though, so still seems to need review.
>>
>> Jim, do you know when you'll have a chance to look at that?
>>
>
> Yes. Compiles and passes for me as well.
>
> One minor point: previously the code did
>
> if (buf->usage_count < BM_MAX_USAGE_COUNT)
>
> but now it does
>
> if (BUF_STATE_GET_USAGECOUNT(buf_state) != BM_MAX_USAGE_COUNT)
>
> being prone to paranoia, I prefer the first, but I've seen both styles in
> the code so I don't know if it's worth futzing with.
>
Ok, let's be paranoic and do this same way as before. Revised patch is
attached.
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| put-buffer-usagecount–logic–back-2.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Arthur Zakirov | 2017-03-20 11:42:32 | Re: Create replication slot in pg_basebackup if requested and not yet present |
| Previous Message | Stas Kelvich | 2017-03-20 11:10:09 | Re: logical decoding of two-phase transactions |