Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded
Date: 2025-12-18 10:38:43
Message-ID: CAPpHfdu_txw9UQ+wWYaHZoHTwt8sONUCoX2MPMakt+5iNh6wmQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi, Xuneng!

On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 6:46 AM Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Remove the erroneous WAIT_LSN_TYPE_COUNT case from the switch
> statement in v5 patch 1.

Thank you for your work on this patchset. Generally, it looks like
good and quite straightforward extension of the current functionality.
But this patch adds 4 new unreserved keywords to our grammar. Do you
think we can put mode into with options clause?

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2025-12-18 10:40:33 Re: Replace is_publishable_class() with relispublishable column in pg_class
Previous Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2025-12-18 10:34:49 RE: Parallel Apply