Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort

From: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort
Date: 2017-10-03 15:26:52
Message-ID: CAPpHfdu3saDk8A1YHL48LfNVN8Uojvmf4m2h_J4cyB9vKxWaWw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Alexander Korotkov
> <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> > I've applied patch on top of c12d570f and rerun the same benchmarks.
> > CSV-file with results is attached. There is no dramatical changes.
> There
> > is still minority of performance regression cases while majority of cases
> > has improvement.
>
> Yes, I think these results look pretty good. But are these times in
> seconds? You might need to do some testing with bigger sorts.

Good point. I'll rerun benchmarks with larger dataset size.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2017-10-03 15:39:12 Re: list of credits for release notes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-10-03 15:20:35 Re: Postgresql gives error that role goes not exists while it exists