| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort |
| Date: | 2017-10-03 11:52:13 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobELYeZaiWFugnUQvv1MG7_rT=UdSHTJGNgdkPm5QfpVg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Alexander Korotkov
<a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> I've applied patch on top of c12d570f and rerun the same benchmarks.
> CSV-file with results is attached. There is no dramatical changes. There
> is still minority of performance regression cases while majority of cases
> has improvement.
Yes, I think these results look pretty good. But are these times in
seconds? You might need to do some testing with bigger sorts.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2017-10-03 12:08:52 | Re: list of credits for release notes |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-10-03 11:33:57 | Re: parallelize queries containing initplans |