Re: unnesting multirange data types

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unnesting multirange data types
Date: 2021-07-18 18:20:32
Message-ID: CAPpHfdt6Yv1T0b4E0Ce0efHa-4x4gHi8nNYgFac9XQdutahTzQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 10:27 PM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> On 7/15/21 12:26 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 6:47 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Yeah, that seems pretty horrid. I still don't like the way the
> >> array casts were done, but I'd be okay with pushing the unnest
> >> addition.
> >
> > +1 for just unnest().
>
> ...which was my original ask at the beginning of the thread :) So +1.

Thanks for the feedback. I've pushed the unnest() patch to master and
pg14. I've initially forgotten to change catversion.h for master, so
I made it with an additional commit.

I've double-checked that "make check-world" passes on my machine for
both master and pg14. And I'm keeping my fingers crossed looking at
buildfarm.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-07-18 20:25:23 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2021-07-18 18:19:10 Re: cleaning up PostgresNode.pm