Re: unnesting multirange data types

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unnesting multirange data types
Date: 2021-07-15 19:26:47
Message-ID: 4e6f4d8e-5a72-f91a-ee8b-ba03d6d053d7@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7/15/21 12:26 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 6:47 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Yeah, that seems pretty horrid. I still don't like the way the
>> array casts were done, but I'd be okay with pushing the unnest
>> addition.
>
> +1 for just unnest().

...which was my original ask at the beginning of the thread :) So +1.

Thanks,

Jonathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhihong Yu 2021-07-15 19:28:13 Re: Removing unneeded self joins
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2021-07-15 19:07:19 Re: [PATCH] psql: \dn+ to show size of each schema..