Re: Small patch for GiST: move childoffnum to child

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Small patch for GiST: move childoffnum to child
Date: 2011-07-13 18:56:47
Message-ID: CAPpHfds5p4U_hM16KBcM2XmC1s9cz2XxCTJEKC3XKTmESOr6+w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thank you very much for detail explanation. But this line of modified patch
seems strange for me:
*newchildoffnum = blkno;
I believe it should be:
*newchildoffnum = i;

------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-07-13 18:58:43 Re: Need help understanding pg_locks
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-07-13 18:45:51 Re: Need help understanding pg_locks