Re: estimation problems for DISTINCT ON with FDW

From: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: estimation problems for DISTINCT ON with FDW
Date: 2020-07-03 11:55:44
Message-ID: CAPmGK15G0X8JELc1f0ifPKspn3eFv526jvYG938uRv3vcOnjbg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 5:19 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Concretely, I now propose the attached, which seems entirely
> safe to back-patch.

The patch looks good to me. And +1 for back-patching.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-07-03 12:34:50 Re: Cleanup - Removed unused function parameter in reorder buffer & parallel vacuum
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-07-03 11:51:28 Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend