| From: | Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Comment for UserMappingPasswordRequired in contrib/postgres_fdw |
| Date: | 2026-02-23 09:36:38 |
| Message-ID: | CAPmGK150xxVYeho6w=UyxhJs8bPo-hwD6XcGuLOJDs64PMO3zQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 8:01 AM Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> wrote:
> On 2/22/26 12:10 PM, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> >> /*
> >> * Checks the value of password_required, defaults to true
> >> * if not defined. The mapping has been pre-validated.
> >> */
> >
> > I like your wording. I am not a native speaker either, though. This
> > would be nitpicking, but I think it is better to clearly mention what
> > the function returns. How about modifying it a bit, like this?
> >
> > /*
> > * Check and return the value of password_required, if defined; otherwise,
> > * return true, which is the default value of it. The mapping has been
> > * pre-validated.
> > */
> No strong opinion. I would be fine with either. I do not think saying
> that it returns is necessary since you can see that from the function
> definition but it does not really harm either.
Ok. I like the modified version as it also keeps the existing comment
to some extent, so I'd like to go with it. Updated patch attached. I
will push and back-patch it to all supported versions if there are no
objections from others.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| comment-fix-2.patch | application/octet-stream | 650 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Naylor | 2026-02-23 09:40:28 | Re: [PATCH] Refactor *_abbrev_convert() functions |
| Previous Message | David Geier | 2026-02-23 09:21:00 | Re: Hash-based MCV matching for large IN-lists |