Re: Performing partition pruning using row value

From: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: "kato-sho(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kato-sho(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performing partition pruning using row value
Date: 2020-07-10 00:35:53
Message-ID: CAPmGK14c60A_Po-DE+3r4MWU84ikB0S+Fz4ErqB=9qVDVMBaog@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fujii-san,

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 7:57 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2020/07/09 19:45, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > Please add the patch to the next CF so that it does not get lost.
>
> Is this a bug rather than new feature?

I think it's a limitation rather than a bug that partition pruning
doesn't support row-wise comparison, so I think the patch is a new
feature.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2020-07-10 01:00:17 Re: Performing partition pruning using row value
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-07-10 00:32:08 Re: Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs