Re: Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs
Date: 2020-07-10 00:32:08
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 02:19:06PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Re-reading this thread it seems to me that the conclusion is to mark the patch
> Returned with Feedback in this commitfest, and possibly expand documentation or
> comments on path canonicalization in the code at some point.
> Does that seem fair?

Yes, that's fair as there is visibly a consensus that we could perhaps
remove some of the canonicalization, but not expand it. There is
nothing preventing to live with the current things in place either, so

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2020-07-10 00:35:53 Re: Performing partition pruning using row value
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-07-10 00:22:04 Re: Intermittent BRIN failures on hyrax and lousyjack