| From: | Christian Convey <christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |
| Date: | 2016-08-18 20:23:08 |
| Message-ID: | CAPfS4ZysWjDc64TN9ZUr6Sgp_EKh4mrAmp5tFfpm5_A80uLg3A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Stefan,
>> I ask because I'm curious if/how someone in Yury's situation could
>> predict which minimum version of CMake must be supported in order for
>> his patch to be accepted. (And if he accepts my offer to pitch in,
>> I'll actually need that particular detail.)
>
> well I personally think the level to meet would be that all the systems
> on the buildfarm that can build -HEAD at the time the patch is proposed
> for a commit should be able to build using the new system with whatever
> cmake version is available in those by default (if it is at all).
What standard would you suggest for those platforms which don't have
an obvious default version of CMake?
I assume this includes all versions of Windows and of OS X, but
perhaps I'm misinformed.
Thanks,
Christian
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-08-18 20:25:49 | Re: synchronous_commit = remote_flush |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-08-18 20:22:25 | Re: Patch: initdb: "'" for QUOTE_PATH (non-windows) |