From: | Chris Angelico <rosuav(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: what Linux to run |
Date: | 2012-03-04 02:55:02 |
Message-ID: | CAPTjJmojKYWykTEUC+EO5rm2f1i_dHToygW+ygOQC1Zxj_WsKw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 1:23 PM, David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> wrote:
> I stick by my opinion that anyone who goes with the OS-bundled version of a
> database server, for any sort of serious production use, is making a
> mistake.
I would qualify this.
If you accept the OS-bundled version, you are relinquishing
responsibility to the OS packagers. If you install your choice of
package, you retain responsibility for choice of version (and if you
install from source, you retain even more). It's not a "mistake" to
use the OS-provided version necessarily, but if you have particular
needs, you always have the option of picking your own version.
ChrisA
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Travers | 2012-03-04 03:01:21 | Re: what Linux to run |
Previous Message | Brent Wood | 2012-03-04 02:49:42 | Re: what Linux to run |