Re: Regarding drop index

From: Ivan Novick <inovick(at)pivotal(dot)io>
To: Abinaya Kajendiran <abinayakajee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Regarding drop index
Date: 2018-01-30 23:57:26
Message-ID: CAPJXddY=sd21h7kruL-EsGGNUh2NEk46nuy5CHPrObEim-Zjgg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Abinaya,

Have you seen some benchmarks showing that an in-memory index will fix some
bottlenecks?

Do you have an idea how much of a gain this will provide?

Can you point to a github repo for it?

Cheers,
Ivan

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 1:12 AM, Abinaya Kajendiran <abinayakajee(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> We are building in-memory index extension for postgres. For drop index
> query, does postgres notify me through index access methods?
>
> Currently, we are using event triggers to capture drop index. If there is
> a better way, please do suggest.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
> Abinaya K
>
>

--
Ivan Novick, Product Manager Pivotal Greenplum
inovick(at)pivotal(dot)io -- (Mobile) 408-230-6491
https://www.youtube.com/GreenplumDatabase

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-01-31 00:02:51 Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Previous Message Andreas Karlsson 2018-01-30 23:52:50 Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays