From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Fix headerscheck failure in replication/worker_internal.h |
Date: | 2021-11-16 17:47:59 |
Message-ID: | CAOuzzgqm1KoJoDNp2o1eFUYNe41ucR=-Hp2+0tv-JJJLY+Yshw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Greetings,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:33 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
wrote:
> On 2021-Nov-16, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> > Short answer is yes, inclusion of be-gssapi-common.h is typically
> > wrapped in a #ifdef, see src/backend/libpq/auth.c
>
> It'd be as in the attached, then.
I’ve not looked at this very closely but no, normally it’s the inclusion of
be-gssapi-common.h that’s wrapped in the ifdef, not the contents of it,
again, see auth.c
Not against possibly changing that but I don’t get the point of including
be-gssapi-common.h if it’s not enabled in the build and typically if GSSAPI
is possible and the reason for including be-gssapi-common.h then there’s
other things that need to be under a ifdef, again, as in auth.c
If there isn’t any need to be-gssapi-common.h then maybe just drop that
include instead of adding an ifdef..?
Thanks,
Stephen
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-11-16 18:01:54 | Re: pgsql: Fix headerscheck failure in replication/worker_internal.h |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-11-16 17:33:46 | Re: pgsql: Fix headerscheck failure in replication/worker_internal.h |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-11-16 18:01:54 | Re: pgsql: Fix headerscheck failure in replication/worker_internal.h |
Previous Message | Daniil Zakhlystov | 2021-11-16 17:40:47 | Re: Commitfest 2021-11 Patch Triage - Part 2 |