| From: | Dharin Shah <dharinshah95(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Aditya Gollamudi <adigollamudi(at)gmail(dot)com>, surya poondla <suryapoondla4(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH][DOC][MINOR] Fix incorrect lexeme limit in textsearch docs |
| Date: | 2026-03-26 22:48:18 |
| Message-ID: | CAOj6k6esm7NoX8sGDd7FVJ=f+ScXqmjGSiwQu0MBW0-amvTxWA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Sorry to drop the ball on this, will get back to cleaning it up and create
a new patch
Thanks,
Dharin
On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 11:02 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Aditya Gollamudi <adigollamudi(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > +1 on this patch, I was also a bit confused on this part of the
> > documentation. All I could conclude was that the number of lexemes in a
> > tsvector was limited by existing tsvector limits. I agree with Surya's
> > comment about the overlap, I think this patch should only remove the line
> > about the 2^64 bound. Patch applies cleanly!
>
> What I'm inclined to do is just drop that <listitem> entirely,
> since it's implied by the 1MB space limit. The patch as-submitted
> accomplishes about the same thing, but takes more words to do it.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-03-26 22:53:06 | Re: [PATCH v1] Fix typos: "its a" -> "it's a" in code comments |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2026-03-26 22:03:15 | Re: Clean up NamedLWLockTranche stuff |