Re: Clean up NamedLWLockTranche stuff

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Clean up NamedLWLockTranche stuff
Date: 2026-03-26 22:03:15
Message-ID: 0ba6cb8c-a893-4445-b8fa-fa9f52be8f39@iki.fi
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 26/03/2026 18:57, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> On 26/03/2026 18:34, Sami Imseih wrote:
>>> I propose the attached refactorings to make this less confusing. See
>>> commit messages for details.
>>
>> I only took a look at 0001 so far, and I do agree with this statement
>> in the commit message:

I committed these now, but I'm all ears if you still have comments on
the rest of the patches.

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dharin Shah 2026-03-26 22:48:18 Re: [PATCH][DOC][MINOR] Fix incorrect lexeme limit in textsearch docs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2026-03-26 22:02:26 Re: [PATCH][DOC][MINOR] Fix incorrect lexeme limit in textsearch docs