From: | Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning |
Date: | 2017-09-03 11:53:25 |
Message-ID: | CAOgcT0OTru=caSBtve7VpP=mihwAZCWsoz67fztRqfBqqkALLw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Jeevan Ladhe
> > <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >> 0001:
> >> This patch refactors RelationBuildPartitionDesc(), basically this is
> patch
> >> 0001 of default range partition[1].
> >
> > I spent a while studying this; it seems to be simpler and there's no
> > real downside. So, committed.
>
>
Thanks Robert for taking care of this.
> BTW, the rest of this series seems to need a rebase. The changes to
> insert.sql conflicted with 30833ba154e0c1106d61e3270242dc5999a3e4f3.
Will rebase the patches.
Regards,
Jeevan Ladhe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-09-03 14:11:37 | Re: JIT & function naming |
Previous Message | Amit Khandekar | 2017-09-03 11:40:20 | Re: UPDATE of partition key |