Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning

From: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning
Date: 2017-09-03 11:53:25
Message-ID: CAOgcT0OTru=caSBtve7VpP=mihwAZCWsoz67fztRqfBqqkALLw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Jeevan Ladhe
> > <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >> 0001:
> >> This patch refactors RelationBuildPartitionDesc(), basically this is
> patch
> >> 0001 of default range partition[1].
> >
> > I spent a while studying this; it seems to be simpler and there's no
> > real downside. So, committed.
>
>
Thanks Robert for taking care of this.

> BTW, the rest of this series seems to need a rebase. The changes to
> insert.sql conflicted with 30833ba154e0c1106d61e3270242dc5999a3e4f3.

Will rebase the patches.

Regards,
Jeevan Ladhe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-09-03 14:11:37 Re: JIT & function naming
Previous Message Amit Khandekar 2017-09-03 11:40:20 Re: UPDATE of partition key