Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning
Date: 2017-09-02 01:33:17
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaoDOEhtmZ=4dncJ6M=7M5kfJpoh53=WKW7UKDk8b_ijA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Jeevan Ladhe
> <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> 0001:
>> This patch refactors RelationBuildPartitionDesc(), basically this is patch
>> 0001 of default range partition[1].
>
> I spent a while studying this; it seems to be simpler and there's no
> real downside. So, committed.

BTW, the rest of this series seems to need a rebase. The changes to
insert.sql conflicted with 30833ba154e0c1106d61e3270242dc5999a3e4f3.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2017-09-02 02:00:44 Re: memory fields from getrusage()
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-09-02 01:30:59 Re: Parallel Hash take II