On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 3:10 PM Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com> wrote:
> +#define MASK_BITS ((uintptr_t) 0x55aa55aa55aa55aa)
>
> Won't this cause a warning in 32 bit builds? (0x55aa55aa definitely
> should work in both?)
Hopefully not -- it's an explicit rather than implicit truncation, and
we've required 64-bit integer support from our compilers for a long
time now. But I'm bad at keeping the rules in my head; did you have a
particular compiler in mind?
(The 32-bit build in Cirrus doesn't seem to mind this, though it does
mind the unused variables that I forgot to wrap in USE_VALGRIND...
will fix.)
--Jacob