Re: [oauth] Stabilize the libpq-oauth ABI (and allow alternative implementations?)

From: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>
To: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [oauth] Stabilize the libpq-oauth ABI (and allow alternative implementations?)
Date: 2026-03-11 07:28:47
Message-ID: CAN4CZFNYau8SmBK-fYLHooTnYwCrB7H6E7eL9EKR5+1aZA0e1Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> did you have a
> particular compiler in mind?

It worked on x86 gcc/clang where I tested it, but I was worried that
postgres supports many different platforms and could cause issues
somewhere.
But it's not an issue: after looking at it for a while I completely
forgot/ignored that the masking expression has several explicit casts,
so it is well defined in C11 and shouldn't cause warnings anywhere.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2026-03-11 07:34:43 Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)
Previous Message Chao Li 2026-03-11 07:04:34 Re: ALTER TABLE: warn when actions do not recurse to partitions