Re: Commitfest PG20-2 is now closed

From: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Cc: shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Commitfest PG20-2 is now closed
Date: 2026-10-01 15:00:15
Message-ID: CAOYmi+nBs3rCVuO4a4-YNLJ46oh_WQ-DfNwKLsO18etM+zsvJg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 1, 2026 at 1:28 AM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> wrote:
> IMO all patches tagged "Bugfix" should be moved forward, regardless of
> thread noise level or whether CI is clean or not. At the same time,
> it's probably appropriate for the CFM to remove the Bugfix tag from
> entries that aren't backpatchable bugfixes, and it's also OK to close
> entries as "rejected" or "withdrawn" as appropriate.

+1

--Jacob

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksander Alekseev 2026-10-01 15:23:49 Re: serializable anomaly - duplicate primary keys
Previous Message Álvaro Herrera 2026-10-01 14:57:42 Re: Allow table AMs to define their own reloptions