Re: Commitfest PG20-2 is now closed

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Commitfest PG20-2 is now closed
Date: 2026-10-01 19:48:47
Message-ID: CAGECzQS0VbGV8K6OHeFbMcC3kHWZP6xO90pWj_-xQHscoDAT=w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 1 Oct 2026 at 11:01, Jacob Champion
<jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2026 at 1:28 AM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> wrote:
> > IMO all patches tagged "Bugfix" should be moved forward, regardless of
> > thread noise level or whether CI is clean or not. At the same time,
> > it's probably appropriate for the CFM to remove the Bugfix tag from
> > entries that aren't backpatchable bugfixes, and it's also OK to close
> > entries as "rejected" or "withdrawn" as appropriate.
>
> +1

Yeah agreed, should be easy to fix

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexandre Felipe 2026-10-01 19:50:35 Throwing away unnecessary spin-locks
Previous Message Greg Burd 2026-10-01 19:10:21 Let an ordering index scan hand its ORDER BY value to the target list