Re: [PATCH] Explain what the default output_plugin_libraries do

From: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Explain what the default output_plugin_libraries do
Date: 2026-11-06 17:02:46
Message-ID: CAOYmi+mzhEA9CtEt33bOboiuuuuCAK+3Of5knkHWtWeSuoWDMA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 1:56 PM Jacob Champion
<jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks everybody for the reviews! v2 has the backpatchable piece. It
> doesn't incorporate Kuroda-san's suggested new section from upthread,
> since that's master-only and can be committed separately once we have
> the wording we like.

(This first part has been backpatched; the new draft section remains
for master. Any other opinions on that one? No rush.)

Thanks,
--Jacob

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2026-11-06 17:05:08 Re: [PATCH] Add a check_hook for output_plugin_libraries
Previous Message Manu 2026-11-06 17:01:20 Re: O(N^3) planning time in choose_plan_name() since 8c49a484e8e