| From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | [PATCH] Explain what the default output_plugin_libraries do |
| Date: | 2026-09-10 16:46:41 |
| Message-ID: | CAOYmi+mt5bcV6B0DZR-t1tfpX8wjk8Aj+ftEd=xXuH5qege2+Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 5:43 AM Jacob Champion
<jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> (The role of each builtin plugin should probably be
> better explained in the documentation for output_plugin_libraries,
> since this is a brand-new consideration for most people...)
Splitting this concern off from the original report: I'd like to
backpatch something like the attached so that it's more obvious why
you might (or might not) want to keep those in the list in the first
place.
WDYT?
Thanks,
--Jacob
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-doc-Improve-output_plugin_libraries-documentation.patch | application/octet-stream | 3.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Maksim.Melnikov | 2026-09-10 16:49:55 | Race between prepared transaction commit and checkpointer |
| Previous Message | Sami Imseih | 2026-09-10 16:39:34 | Re: pgstat: Flush some statistics within running transactions, take 2 |