Re: Remove unused function parameters, part 1: contrib

From: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Remove unused function parameters, part 1: contrib
Date: 2025-12-01 18:15:48
Message-ID: CAOYmi+mJHqosCVOwP=K=oyrVszLetsOnYmYGrj9fR2seTauP8w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 4:13 AM Bertrand Drouvot
<bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> This function is already exercised with the tests added in f2464997644c so that
> looks ok to me.
>
> Maybe Jacob or Andrew have some thoughts to share?

Ooh, blast from the past! You've found my very first Postgres review.
I do not remember it at all. :D

Your v2-0005 looks more correct (and less confusing) to me. I'm not
qualified to comment on the historical behavior of citext+collations.

--Jacob

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Álvaro Herrera 2025-12-01 18:18:13 Re: split tablecmds.c
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2025-12-01 17:51:19 Re: Remove useless casting to the same type