Re: pg_createsubscriber does not check output_plugin_libraries

From: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_createsubscriber does not check output_plugin_libraries
Date: 2026-09-16 15:56:01
Message-ID: CAOYmi+krun4a8ACxcP4MtvPU6SMrowwENSvh7yzc5mhEJ85k_g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 2:06 AM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The "Should not happen" comment should be removed because this can happen?
> For example, if output_plugin_libraries is set to 'test_decoding, '

Ugh, the fact that you can do that at all is a bug. Thank you for
pointing it out; I'll fix it.

> Regarding the backpatch of the 0001 patch, I'm leaning toward treating this
> as an improvement for master only.

That sounds reasonable to me.

--Jacob

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2026-09-16 16:07:00 Re: Distinguish publication exclusions in object addresses
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2026-09-16 15:52:31 Re: pgsql: Revert online data checksum transitions