Re: [oauth] Split and extend PGOAUTHDEBUG

From: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [oauth] Split and extend PGOAUTHDEBUG
Date: 2026-04-01 22:59:24
Message-ID: CAOYmi+kfw76zPa-tZPNs4KjxwthGLkQfpGyoKzMMy8_oNJz4DQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 1, 2026 at 2:13 PM Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com> wrote:
> With the same logic, shouldn't we print a very visible warning when
> somebody enables trace? Since it's a long output, maybe to both the
> beginning and end of the flow?

I'm more than happy to strengthen this as well, but let's kick that
out to its own thread, especially if pieces are backpatchable.

--Jacob

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2026-04-01 23:01:49 Re: Changing the state of data checksums in a running cluster
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2026-04-01 22:57:10 Re: unclear OAuth error message