| From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] OAuth: fix performance bug with stuck multiplexer events |
| Date: | 2025-08-07 18:19:21 |
| Message-ID: | CAOYmi+=3koJQD+u2ucSAWGsSa_5rKUcnmK5oMyGuSRkFssaZWQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 7:43 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 1:45 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I wonder if you would be interested in this attempt at centralised
> infrastructure for unit testing our C code over here. I'm not
> suggesting it for your immediate problem, just noting the overlap:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BhUKG%2BajSQ_8eu2AogTncOnZ5me2D-Cn66iN_-wZnRjLN%2Bicg%40mail.gmail.com
I am all for better testability at the function level, and it even
looks like 0002 solved a problem that stopped me from getting rid of
the Perl shim...
The "test without a running server" part also might have some overlap
with my fuzzing work. So I'll take a closer look later; thanks!
--Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-08-07 18:20:33 | Re: Add progressive backoff to XactLockTableWait functions |
| Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2025-08-07 18:11:46 | Re: [PATCH] OAuth: fix performance bug with stuck multiplexer events |