| From: | Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: expanding inheritance in partition bound order |
| Date: | 2017-08-10 09:52:55 |
| Message-ID: | CAOG9ApFvQpJE1DPqwkcC8gd69hoAxPdz0kmK5FBNOLbGLG9Jpg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Amit,
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 7:41 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> On 2017/08/05 2:25, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Concretely, my proposal is:
>>
>> P.S. While I haven't reviewed 0002 in detail, I think the concept of
>> minimizing what needs to be built in RelationGetPartitionDispatchInfo
>> is a very good idea.
>
> I put this patch ahead in the list and so it's now 0001.
>
FYI, 0001 patch throws the warning:
execMain.c: In function ‘ExecSetupPartitionTupleRouting’:
execMain.c:3342:16: warning: ‘next_ptinfo’ may be used uninitialized
in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
next_ptinfo->parentid != ptinfo->parentid)
--
Beena Emerson
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Ford | 2017-08-10 10:21:21 | Fix number skipping in to_number |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-08-10 09:43:44 | Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables |