| From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, postgres(at)piotr-stefaniak(dot)me |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_bsd_indent and -Wimplicit-fallthrough |
| Date: | 2020-05-15 12:15:53 |
| Message-ID: | CAOBaU_a485UAUrQ2FyBEUVSm77qYF9M79eNxdiKS+Hq3vsAggA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 9:17 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
> > On 15 May 2020, at 08:28, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 8:03 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> >> Something like the attached is fine to take care of those warnings,
> >> but what's our current patching policy for this tool?
> >
> > The patch looks good to me. It looks like we already have custom
> > patches, so +1 to applying it.
>
> Shouldn't we try and propose it to upstream first to minimize our diff?
Good point, adding Piotr.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christoph Berg | 2020-05-15 12:15:59 | Re: ldap tls test fails in some environments |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2020-05-15 11:50:55 | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions |