Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date: 2021-06-15 14:07:32
Message-ID: CAOBaU_ZLs8OzPSOG4m-bLrg4AC3BO6GSo77VvUhAVOoOr-UD7g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 9:31 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
> Rather than use size, I'd be inclined to say use this if the source
> database is marked as a template, and use the copydir approach for
> anything that isn't.

Looks like a good approach.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 孙冰 2021-06-15 14:13:54 Confused by the default privilege
Previous Message Robert Haas 2021-06-15 14:00:49 Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety