Re: [DOCS] Correction

Hi Tom,

Then I guess I will need to read that part of the chapter again.
Many thanks for the clarification.

Gokhan.

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> demirgokhan(at)gmail(dot)com writes:
> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/datatype-json.html
> > Description:
>
> > Shouldn&#39;t be below statement:
>
> > &quot;Although the jsonb_path_ops operator class supports only queries
> with the
> > @&gt; operator, it has notable performance advantages over the default
> operator
> > class jsonb_ops.&quot;
>
> > corrected to:
>
> > &quot;Although the jsonb_path_ops operator class supports only queries
> with the ?
> > operator, it has notable performance advantages over the default operator
> > class jsonb_ops.&quot;
>
> Uh, no, I don't think so:
>
> regression=# select oid from pg_opfamily where opfname = 'jsonb_path_ops';
> oid
> ------
> 4037
> (1 row)
>
> regression=# select amopopr::regoperator from pg_amop where amopfamily =
> 4037;
> amopopr
> -----------------
> @>(jsonb,jsonb)
> (1 row)
>
> regards, tom lane
>