Re: Correction

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: demirgokhan(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Correction
Date: 2017-11-19 21:17:59
Message-ID: 29321.1511126279@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

demirgokhan(at)gmail(dot)com writes:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/datatype-json.html
> Description:

> Shouldn&#39;t be below statement:

> &quot;Although the jsonb_path_ops operator class supports only queries with the
> @&gt; operator, it has notable performance advantages over the default operator
> class jsonb_ops.&quot;

> corrected to:

> &quot;Although the jsonb_path_ops operator class supports only queries with the ?
> operator, it has notable performance advantages over the default operator
> class jsonb_ops.&quot;

Uh, no, I don't think so:

regression=# select oid from pg_opfamily where opfname = 'jsonb_path_ops';
oid
------
4037
(1 row)

regression=# select amopopr::regoperator from pg_amop where amopfamily = 4037;
amopopr
-----------------
@>(jsonb,jsonb)
(1 row)

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Correction at 2017-11-19 19:38:09 from demirgokhan

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2017-11-20 16:39:36 Migration to pglister - Before
Previous Message demirgokhan 2017-11-19 19:38:09 Correction