| From: | Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add additional extended protocol commands to psql: \parse and \bindx |
| Date: | 2025-06-23 07:04:15 |
| Message-ID: | CAO6_XqqC7u72-Phs7Qn32OmoCy7SPCG7z_s4Lvwp2NjDVsq9QA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 9:09 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> Good point. I would be on board with a \close_prepared then, if
> that's the consensus we reach, without touching at \bind_named. We
> still have time to decide on the name until the release, just let's
> make sure to not do a rename multiple times.
True. That would also allow adding a \close_cursor meta-command
without name ambiguity.
Since the consensus seems to lean toward \close_prepared, I've
prepared the patch to rename the command. I haven't modified the
traduction files though, I think they're updated through a different
process?
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v01-0001-Rename-close-to-close_prepared.patch | application/octet-stream | 10.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2025-06-23 07:21:46 | Re: [PATCH] Add additional extended protocol commands to psql: \parse and \bindx |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-06-23 07:02:21 | Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication |