| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add additional extended protocol commands to psql: \parse and \bindx |
| Date: | 2025-06-23 13:25:32 |
| Message-ID: | 2d01932a-689c-4d9e-b94c-43a73977e974@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 23.06.25 09:04, Anthonin Bonnefoy wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 9:09 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> Good point. I would be on board with a \close_prepared then, if
>> that's the consensus we reach, without touching at \bind_named. We
>> still have time to decide on the name until the release, just let's
>> make sure to not do a rename multiple times.
>
> True. That would also allow adding a \close_cursor meta-command
> without name ambiguity.
>
> Since the consensus seems to lean toward \close_prepared, I've
> prepared the patch to rename the command.
Looks good to me, thanks.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Anne Struble | 2025-06-23 13:36:08 | Re: Memory allocation error DDL invalidation (seen with 15.13 & 16.9) |
| Previous Message | Damien Clochard | 2025-06-23 13:18:43 | Re: Security Label Inheritance |