Re: Travis and AppVeyor continuous integration [Re: feature/master/ci]

I've added AppVeyor as well (as an app).

Best,
Thomas

On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 at 14:46, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> wrote:

> On 08/30/20 01:34, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> > I had no idea Travis-CI could be installed as an app with access to
> > selected repositories. Thanks for pointing that out. As that addresses my
> > concerns, it's now installed for the tada organization and has access to
> > the pljava repo.
>
> Many thanks for that. I did begin some experimenting with GitHub Actions
> in my own fork last night, and it seems promising, but it will be helpful
> to have the existing Travis-CI support working while continuing down
> that road.
>
> Do you have a verdict on AppVeyor? I think it has an app-based setup
> similar to Travis, perhaps with even fewer permissions, according to
> Kartik's earlier mail. The current configuration uses AppVeyor for
> the Windows MSVC and Windows MinGW-w64 builds.
>
> It was amidst the Windows details in GitHub Actions that I walked away
> in exhaustion last night. But Windows details exhaust me on a good day.
> Perhaps Kartik will be interested in lending a hand with that part
> after the official end of GSoC. We might both welcome a chance to do
> some other things and then come back to it, though. Maybe even other
> PL/Java things. If the completed AppVeyor configuration were working,
> at least the CI coverage he has already achieved would all be in place.
>
> Regards,
> -Chap
>