| From: | Peter Travers <traverspw(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] proposal to surface index used by replica identity |
| Date: | 2026-06-16 01:49:03 |
| Message-ID: | CAO1T5yR3fp7W+8RWa6z3kz9ix2Hsa0qTzUHbuXJS05Nx1+8Xdw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hey Ashutosh,
Good catch, I missed that thread. I'll catch-up and see if I have anything
to add
Cheers,
Peter
On Mon, Jun 15, 2026, 06:47 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 2:50 AM Peter Travers <traverspw(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are building internal CDC tooling and have found it challenging to
> identify which index is used as the replica identity for a publication. I
> propose adding two new columns, replident and replidentidx, to the
> pg_publication_tables catalog view so users can easily see this
> configuration.
> >
> > I have attached a patch with the implementation and updated regression
> tests. Please let me know if you feel this is a valuable addition or if you
> have any concerns with this approach.
>
> I had proposed something closely related to this in
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAExHW5sSmbnFCiMX=smSQSdaxkWPvZbMYaZq2bSE7+SD5wSWOA@mail.gmail.com
> .
> We are discussing possible options when the publishing via root. Maybe
> you could add your proposal to that thread and also help us take the
> discussion forward there.
>
> --
> Best Wishes,
> Ashutosh Bapat
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tender Wang | 2026-06-16 01:58:07 | Re: assertion failure with unique index + partitioning + join |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2026-06-16 01:44:23 | Re: typedef struct WindowClause misleading comments |