| From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Travers <traverspw(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] proposal to surface index used by replica identity |
| Date: | 2026-06-15 10:46:50 |
| Message-ID: | CAExHW5tQ-9-Xp-WqO+L3FZ+NgoE5z-yTmEA1kdz1Nb6FPhX=dA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Peter,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 2:50 AM Peter Travers <traverspw(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We are building internal CDC tooling and have found it challenging to identify which index is used as the replica identity for a publication. I propose adding two new columns, replident and replidentidx, to the pg_publication_tables catalog view so users can easily see this configuration.
>
> I have attached a patch with the implementation and updated regression tests. Please let me know if you feel this is a valuable addition or if you have any concerns with this approach.
I had proposed something closely related to this in
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAExHW5sSmbnFCiMX=smSQSdaxkWPvZbMYaZq2bSE7+SD5wSWOA@mail.gmail.com.
We are discussing possible options when the publishing via root. Maybe
you could add your proposal to that thread and also help us take the
discussion forward there.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2026-06-15 10:54:24 | Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2026-06-15 10:39:26 | Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication |