| From: | Matthias Kurz <m(dot)kurz(at)irregular(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, e(dot)indrupskaya(at)postgrespro(dot)ru |
| Subject: | Re: SQL/JSON revisited |
| Date: | 2023-05-03 16:51:56 |
| Message-ID: | CAO=2mx4KFWKwk9HAgCyRn55EDg33N2-5cKvJpv8SWRGLx_A1EA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 5 Apr 2023 at 09:53, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Okay, I've marked the CF entry as committed then.
>
This was marked as commited in the 2023-03 commitfest, however there are
still patches missing (for example the JSON_TABLE one).
However, I can not see an entry in the current 2023-07 Commitfest.
I think it would be a good idea for a new entry in the current commitfest,
just to not forget about the not-yet-commited features.
Thanks!
Matthias
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2023-05-03 17:58:53 | Re: [PATCH] Clarify the behavior of the system when approaching XID wraparound |
| Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2023-05-03 16:30:34 | Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command |