Re: Autoprewarm workers terminated due to a segmentation fault

From: Glauber Batista <glauberrbatista(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autoprewarm workers terminated due to a segmentation fault
Date: 2026-07-01 19:16:45
Message-ID: CAO+_mTT-7EB=vWmpDbaZ_H0J7pEmv8fsBMvYdnc-my7pZTW2Zw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Hello,

I finally got the chance and time to test the patch. I'm using it on a
replica for now and it's working as expected.

2026-07-01 19:09:35 UTC::@:[169848]:LOG: database system is ready to
accept read-only connections
2026-07-01 19:09:35 UTC::@:[174803]:LOG: started streaming WAL from
primary at B7E/24000000 on timeline 1
2026-07-01 19:09:35 UTC::@:[174804]:LOG: autoprewarm successfully
prewarmed 0 of 131072 previously-loaded blocks

Thank you all for your hard work!

Best,
Glauber Cassiano Batista

Em seg., 29 de jun. de 2026 às 12:13, Melanie Plageman <
melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> escreveu:

> On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 1:55 PM Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> wrote:
> >
> > FWIW I've committed the v2 fix (I liked it more), and I've backpatched
> > it to 18.
>
> Thank you so much for doing this. I had it on my list for next week,
> but a few other things got ahead of it. I really, really appreciate
> you taking on committing it!
>
> - Melanie
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2026-07-02 14:38:16 Re: Fw:Re: Fw: gbt_var_consistent in contrib/btree_gist/btree_utils_var.c has internal-node type confusion on the <> strategy, bypassing exclusion constraints
Previous Message Tom Lane 2026-07-01 17:33:51 Re: BUG #19524: NaN handling in btree_gist's float4/float8 opclasses