Re: Autoprewarm workers terminated due to a segmentation fault

From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>
Cc: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>, Glauber Batista <glauberrbatista(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autoprewarm workers terminated due to a segmentation fault
Date: 2026-06-29 15:12:50
Message-ID: CAAKRu_Zu3LQyq8b5E7kZNAnD=YpPsK5sXsGCxK+H59rLav0BXQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 1:55 PM Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> wrote:
>
> FWIW I've committed the v2 fix (I liked it more), and I've backpatched
> it to 18.

Thank you so much for doing this. I had it on my list for next week,
but a few other things got ahead of it. I really, really appreciate
you taking on committing it!

- Melanie

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bill Kim 2026-06-29 15:27:21 Re: BUG #19524: NaN handling in btree_gist's float4/float8 opclasses
Previous Message Tom Lane 2026-06-29 15:04:41 Re: BUG #19524: NaN handling in btree_gist's float4/float8 opclasses