Re: Parallelize WAL Sender and WAL receiver

From: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallelize WAL Sender and WAL receiver
Date: 2024-09-05 01:34:03
Message-ID: CANzqJaBOwZd3r3KhS3DsGZ9TiSJahvGC+Z127Q_riT+zxinD0Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 9:04 PM Karthik Yellapragada <
karthik(dot)yellapragada(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> I frequently face the problem of wals generated faster than the wals
> transferred and applied.
>
> Is there a way to speed up the process? So I don’t accumulate a lot of
> WALs at the primary?
>

Accumulation on the *primary* sounds like slow (or not-fast-enough)
networking.
Or using synchronous replication instead of async replication.
Or a combination of both.

--
Death to America, and butter sauce.
Iraq lobster!

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Keith 2024-09-05 01:41:37 Re: Parallelize WAL Sender and WAL receiver
Previous Message Karthik Yellapragada 2024-09-05 01:03:57 Parallelize WAL Sender and WAL receiver