| From: | Keith <keith(at)keithf4(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Karthik Yellapragada <karthik(dot)yellapragada(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallelize WAL Sender and WAL receiver |
| Date: | 2024-09-05 01:41:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAHw75vu+DxaY-fNGT0br4uEcLj+ky1GM=xxge-3+08RWdVtYsQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 9:04 PM Karthik Yellapragada <
karthik(dot)yellapragada(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I frequently face the problem of wals generated faster than the wals
> transferred and applied.
>
> Is there a way to speed up the process? So I don’t accumulate a lot of
> WALs at the primary?
>
> Regards,
> Karthik.
> --
> Thanks & Regards
> Karthik Yellapragada
> +1 860 830 5235
>
Take a look at pgBackRest. It provides an option for asynchronous WAL
archiving and retrieval. The actual replay of the WAL is always single
threaded.
Keith
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rui DeSousa | 2024-09-05 01:52:01 | Re: Parallelize WAL Sender and WAL receiver |
| Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2024-09-05 01:34:03 | Re: Parallelize WAL Sender and WAL receiver |